Helen Ghosh, Kate Mavor as well as Duncan Wilson’s answer to John Harris’s article close the Stonehenge tunnel (Letters, 27 April) alone misses the point. The Stonehenge basis heritage site landscape is unutterably precious as well as yous tamper alongside it at your risk – yous cannot become far come upward back. There should move perpetual query hither as well as the Britain government, the National Trust as well as English linguistic communication Heritage either value that or they don’t. The tunnel system volition clearly compromise the archaeology. Whose involvement would that move in? It would move amend to trust the experts. The joint arguing from 21 archaeological specialists working at the Stonehenge site from xiv Britain universities as well as the international Icomos-Unesco team report of late provided detailed as well as empirically based rebuttals of the tunnel plans as well as clearly highlight diverse dangers it poses to the area’s archeology as well as feel of place.
Professor David Jacques
Blick Mead projection director, University of Buckingham
Read the residue of this article...
Post a Comment
Post a Comment